Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/25/1966
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 141 N.W.2d 517
- 273 Minn. 394
- 1966 Minn. LEXIS 841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that \any test for applying the statute was clearly intended to emphasize the `person's conduct' rather than the offenses committed\
- explaining tests for determining what is a single behavioral incident for purposes of Minn.Stat. § 609.035
- describing the factors as time, place, and an effort to obtain a single criminal objective
- violations part of same behavioral incident when they took place within period of few minutes and distance of two blocks
- in determining whether intentional crimes are committed in a single behavioral incident, factors to be considered are time, place, and “whether the segment of conduct involved was motivated by an effort to obtain a single criminal objective”
- in determining whether intentional crimes are committed in a single behavioral incident, factors to be considered are time, place, and \whether the segment of conduct involved was motivated by an effort to obtain a single criminal objective.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogosheske
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-02-21· cited 193×
- State v. GracianoWashington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 185×
- State v. BertschSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 96×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-27· cited 82×
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 74×
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-27· cited 69×
- State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-07-02· cited 65×
- State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-08· cited 63×
- Commonwealth. v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 59×
- State v. ReilandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-05-06· cited 48×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-13· cited 46×
- State v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-03-28· cited 44×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-03-02· cited 42×
- Crampton v. 54-A District JudgeMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-08-27· cited 42×
- State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-09-13· cited 39×
- State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-04-11· cited 38×
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-01-05· cited 37×
- Hankerson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-26· cited 35×
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-03-14· cited 34×
- Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-01-17· cited 32×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-12-13· cited 950×
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-04-21· cited 425×
- People v. TidemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-04-27· cited 126×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-01-22· cited 30×
- State v. KlugherzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-01-29· cited 17×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1902-06-13· cited 16×
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-10-29· cited 15×
- People v. BlueCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-05-28· cited 14×
- City of Bloomington v. KossowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-11-13· cited 14×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-10-24· cited 12×
- State v. ObermanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-06-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.