Skip to main content

State v. Shumate

Citations

  • 275 S.E.2d 288
  • 276 S.C. 46
  • 1981 S.C. LEXIS 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a failure to object to a sentence at the time of sentencing precludes appellate review of the matter
  • stating that failure to timely object to or seek modification of sentence in trial court precludes objection for first time on appeal
  • holding a defendant’s failure to timely object to or seek modification of his sentence from the trial judge precludes the defendant from presenting an objection for the first time on appeal
  • holding where appellant’s contention was not advanced at the probation revocation hearing, failure to object or seek modification of the revocation sentence in the trial court foreclosed consideration of issue on appeal
  • holing a defendant's failure \to object to or seek modification of the revocation sentence in the trial court\ precludes challenging the sentence on appeal
  • holing a defendant's failure \to object to or seek modification of the revocation sentence in the trial court\ precludes challenging the sentence on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.