State v. Thomason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the court will limit its review to those terms fully set forth in the record, and neither the State nor the defendant can enforce terms not appearing on the record before the judge who accepts a plea.
• “Our supreme court has recognized a plea agreement rests on contractual principles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carlson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 49×
• State v. Rikard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 7×
• Williams v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-09-05· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Santobello v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
• State v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-13· cited 177×
• State v. Hoffman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 90×
• State v. Johnston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-04· cited 58×
• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-05-05· cited 31×
• State v. Gulledge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-23· cited 25×
• Rollison v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-20· cited 20×
• Butler v. Sea Pines Plantation Co.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-11· cited 19×
• State v. Pace
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-05· cited 19×
• State v. Riddle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-17· cited 19×
• State v. Barton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-20· cited 17×
• State v. Cantrell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-30· cited 14×
• State v. Gates
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-10· cited 6×
• Alston v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-20· cited 6×