Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/15/2009

State v. Ransom

Citations

207 P.3d 208
288 Kan. 697
2009 Kan. LEXIS 106
2009 WL 1347397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that this court has “previously approved the causation aspect of PIK Crim. 3d 56.02”
mistrial abuse of discretion standard \does not change even if legal error prompted consideration of a mistrial\; applying standard of whether any reasonable person would take the same view
mistrial abuse of discretion standard “does not change even if legal error prompted consideration of a mistrial”; applying standard of whether any reasonable person would take the same view
whether confrontation rights have been violated is a question of law subject to unlimited review
substantial competent evidence supports the trial court factual findings that defendant was not impaired by drugs or alcohol and that there were no signs of physical or psychological coercion
whether confrontation rights have been violated is a question of law subject to unlimited review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, McFarland, Standridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.