· 3/23/2012
State v. Sanchez-Loredo
Citations
- 272 P.3d 34
- 294 Kan. 50
- 2012 Kan. LEXIS 210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that when the State fails to put on evidence to meet its burden of proving inevitability, the inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply
- clarifying that court would not address issues not cross-appealed by defendant
- \[T]he automobile exception has no separate exigency requirement beyond a showing of mobility of the vehicle.\
- probable cause to search a motor vehicle requires a “ ‘fair probability’ that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence” based on the “totality of the circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Moritz, Sachse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.