Skip to main content
· 3/23/2012

State v. Sanchez-Loredo

Citations

  • 272 P.3d 34
  • 294 Kan. 50
  • 2012 Kan. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that when the State fails to put on evidence to meet its burden of proving inevitability, the inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply
  • clarifying that court would not address issues not cross-appealed by defendant
  • \[T]he automobile exception has no separate exigency requirement beyond a showing of mobility of the vehicle.\
  • probable cause to search a motor vehicle requires a “ ‘fair probability’ that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence” based on the “totality of the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Moritz, Sachse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.