Supreme Court of Iowa· 4/21/1982
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 318 N.W.2d 417
- 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Iowa Code § 232.74 eliminates the privilege in all cases involving child abuse
- concluding that suppression of a defendant’s statements is not an appropriate remedy for the government’s violation of the no-contact rule
- concluding that suppression of a defendant's statements is not an appropriate remedy for the government's violation of the no-contact rule
- holding that Iowa Code § 232.74 eliminates the privilege in all cases involving child abuse
- holding that Iowa Code § 232.74 eliminates the privilege in all cases involving child abuse
- concluding sixth amendment right to counsel attached prior to a second interview, which took place after a complaint was filed and a warrant procured at the county attorney’s behest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Uhlenhopp, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KaheySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-06-27· cited 369×
- People v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-21· cited 200×
- People v. OwensIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 176×
- State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1990-12-27· cited 160×
- Fryer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-10-27· cited 105×
- State Of Iowa Vs. Wayne Samuel BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa· 2010-12-23· cited 100×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 96×
- State v. CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-12-24· cited 94×
- State v. EfflerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-07-17· cited 78×
- State of Iowa v. John David GreenSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-06-09· cited 77×
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-01-22· cited 71×
- State v. SpargoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-03-20· cited 64×
- Cannady v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-24· cited 52×
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-06-15· cited 45×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-09-13· cited 43×
- State v. WhitselSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-10-19· cited 41×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-11-15· cited 40×
- Jeffrey Linn Hall v. State of Iowa and Attorney General of IowaEighth Circuit· 1983-04-15· cited 38×
- State v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1987-07-22· cited 38×
- State v. DossSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-09-19· cited 38×
Cites
117 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 1,651×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-04· cited 737×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 676×
- Chandler v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 257×
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-02-11· cited 226×
- People v. JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-09-17· cited 150×
- Michael A. Mayola v. State of AlabamaFifth Circuit· 1980-10-01· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. RichmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-22· cited 136×
- State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-04-14· cited 123×
- State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-02-21· cited 118×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.