Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 318 N.W.2d 417
  • 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Iowa Code § 232.74 eliminates the privilege in all cases involving child abuse
  • concluding that suppression of a defendant’s statements is not an appropriate remedy for the government’s violation of the no-contact rule
  • concluding that suppression of a defendant's statements is not an appropriate remedy for the government's violation of the no-contact rule
  • holding that Iowa Code § 232.74 eliminates the privilege in all cases involving child abuse
  • holding that Iowa Code § 232.74 eliminates the privilege in all cases involving child abuse
  • concluding sixth amendment right to counsel attached prior to a second interview, which took place after a complaint was filed and a warrant procured at the county attorney’s behest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Uhlenhopp, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

117 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.