Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 636 N.W.2d 26
  • 2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 217
  • 2001 WL 1434192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing a similar provision in section 232.74 as an “exception” to the marital privilege codified in section 622.9
  • noting the standard of review for a ruling interpreting a privilege statute is for correction of errors at law
  • declining to recognize an additional nonstatutory exception to the marital privilege
  • declining to recognize an additional nonstatutory exception to the marital privilege
  • “Generally, a district court commits reversible error by failing to instruct the jury on all lesser-included offenses.”
  • “Generally, a district court commits reversible error by failing to instruct the jury on all lesser-included offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.