State v. Purdum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a probationer impliedly consented to “limited seizure of his person necessary to effectuate” a probation condition authorizing random blood, breath, or urinalysis testing
• “[Tjhis Court has determined that a probationer’s consent to searches constitutes a waiver of Fourth Amendment rights.”
• “While the United States Supreme Court has not yet addressed whether a probationer may waive his Fourth Amendment rights through acceptance of probationary search conditions (fn.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).