Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/24/1994
State v. Jacobs
Citations
- 229 Conn. 385
- 641 A.2d 1351
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the exclusionary rule would not apply to prevent the fruits of a claimed illegal search from being introduced at a probation revocation hearing
- observing ‘‘that, unlike crimi- nal trials, in which the exclusionary rule typically applies, in probation revocation hearings, the exclusion- ary rule typically does not apply’’
- observing ‘‘that, unlike crimi- nal trials, in which the exclusionary rule typically applies, in probation revocation hearings, the exclusion- ary rule typically does not apply’’
- ‘‘[w]e note initially that, unlike criminal trials, in which the exclusionary rule typically applies, in probation revocation hearings, the exclusionary rule typically does not apply’’
- exclusionary rule does not generally apply to probation revocation proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Borden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-16· cited 44×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-02-28· cited 28×
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. FuessenichConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-01· cited 10×
- State v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-30· cited 9×
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-26· cited 7×
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-02-10· cited 6×
- State v. RomeroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-07-14· cited 3×
- Housing Authority v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-01-21· cited 3×
- State v. WalkerSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-02-21· cited 2×
- State v. SantosConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-01-04· cited 1×
- State v. MaiettaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-03-15
- State v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-01-24
- State ex rel. Dunn v. ConnellyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-10-08
- State v. SkyesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-05-27
- State v. DukesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-09
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-16· cited 178×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 128×
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-24· cited 103×
- Plyler v. EvattSupreme Court· 1988-10-11· cited 75×
- United States v. Jess FarmerSixth Circuit· 1975-03-18· cited 74×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-20· cited 66×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-16· cited 57×
- State v. AlfaroArizona Supreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-08-07· cited 23×
- State v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-02-16· cited 5×
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-09· cited 2×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-04-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.