Supreme Court of Connecticut· 10/30/2001
State v. Foster
Citations
- 258 Conn. 501
- 782 A.2d 98
- 2001 Conn. LEXIS 442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exclusionary rule not applied to probation violation hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-28· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-28· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-28· cited 11×
- State v. ParadisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-27· cited 8×
- In Re Nicholas R.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-15· cited 6×
- State v. RomeroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-07-14· cited 3×
- State v. MaiettaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-03-15
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-18· cited 496×
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-09-06· cited 152×
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-24· cited 103×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-21· cited 81×
- Plyler v. EvattSupreme Court· 1988-10-11· cited 75×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-20· cited 66×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-24· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.