State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing whether a term of the defendant’s probation was lawful, the court first determined that the terms of the written judgment controlled over oral statements made by the trial court
• defendant pleaded guilty; on appeal, she challenged her sentence on statutory and constitutional grounds; court reviewed under ORS 138.050(1)(a) and ORS 138.222(4)(a)
• “[A] written judgment prevails over oral statements by a court that underlie the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 30×
• State v. Dilts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 19×
• State v. MacK
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-07· cited 15×
• Roe v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 12×
• State v. Sperry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-10· cited 11×
• State v. Rudnick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 3×
• Silberman-Doney v. Gargan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-17· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zockert v. Fanning
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-08· cited 84×
• State v. Swain
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 76×
• State v. Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-06-20· cited 56×
• State v. Donovan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-07· cited 47×
• State v. Saxon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 7×
• State v. Handley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-02· cited 7×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-05-04· cited 3×