State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ORS 475.235 as interpreted and applied in Hancock was constitutional
• state lab report finding controlled dangerous substances in defendant's urine sample held testimonial
• ORS 475.235 does not violate a defendant’s confrontation rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. O'MALEY
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-05· cited 26×
• State v. Choin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-05· cited 6×
• State v. Dibbern
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-10-31
• State v. Rodriguez-Barrera
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-10-31

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Swain
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 76×
• State v. Hancock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 36×
• State v. Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 30×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-04· cited 24×