State v. Wetzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that terms of written judgment imposing sentence controlled over oral statements made by the sentencing court because it was clear that the court “misspoke”
• before imposing the cost of appointed counsel, the court must find the present ability to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 30×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-11· cited 6×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-13· cited 5×
• State v. Casas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-27· cited 3×
• Danielson v. Maass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 3×
• State v. Ashcroft
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Swain
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 76×
• State v. Jackson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-10-04· cited 56×