State v. SUPANCHICK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Court’s opinion in Giles does not suggest that [a defendant’s] sole or even primary purpose in making the victim unavailable must have been to prevent the victim from reporting defendant to the authorities or testifying against him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pickens (Slip Opinion)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-12-16· cited 130×
• State v. Sewell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-10· cited 24×
• State v. Supanchick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-02-13· cited 18×
• Stone v. Witt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-10· cited 7×
• State v. Jacob
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-15· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Reynolds v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
• Giles v. California
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 725×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Campbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-08-20· cited 124×
• State v. Cook
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 90×
• State v. Shaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 64×
• State v. Nielsen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 62×
• State v. Barone
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 59×
• State v. Sparks
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-01-23· cited 50×
• State v. Page
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 19×
• State v. Kayfes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-27· cited 11×
• State v. Harberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-30· cited 10×
• State v. KAYFES
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-26· cited 4×
• State v. Bigej
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-12-18· cited 1×