· 9/28/2011
State v. SUPANCHICK
Citations
- 263 P.3d 378
- 245 Or. App. 651
- 263 P.3d 278
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Court’s opinion in Giles does not suggest that [a defendant’s] sole or even primary purpose in making the victim unavailable must have been to prevent the victim from reporting defendant to the authorities or testifying against him.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.