Skip to main content
· 9/28/2011

State v. SUPANCHICK

Citations

  • 263 P.3d 378
  • 245 Or. App. 651
  • 263 P.3d 278
  • 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Court’s opinion in Giles does not suggest that [a defendant’s] sole or even primary purpose in making the victim unavailable must have been to prevent the victim from reporting defendant to the authorities or testifying against him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.