North Dakota Supreme Court· 4/8/1971
State v. Iverson
Citations
- 187 N.W.2d 1
- 1971 N.D. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- while some compulsion is inherent in a subpoena, Miranda is expressly inapposite to “general questioning of citizens in fact-finding process”
- while some compulsion is inherent in a subpoena, Miranda is expressly inapposite to “general questioning of citizens in fact-finding process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erickstad, Teigen, Strutz, Paulson, Knudson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 476×
- State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court· 1971-12-29· cited 256×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-30· cited 167×
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 139×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-06-12· cited 110×
- Asbridge v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 93×
- State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-07-11· cited 75×
- State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-01-21· cited 66×
- State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-06-26· cited 60×
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 51×
- State v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 48×
- James Leroy Iverson v. State of North DakotaEighth Circuit· 1973-06-11· cited 43×
- State v. GoodmonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 42×
- State v. LarkinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1972-12-12· cited 41×
- Walker v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-11-12· cited 39×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-15· cited 37×
- State v. AschmellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1973-07-12· cited 36×
- State v. OhnstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-12-19· cited 36×
- State v. PfisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-03-30· cited 35×
- State v. SchmeetsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 33×
Cites
108 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
Other cases named State v. Iverson
38 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-10· cited 74×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-07· cited 41×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-10· cited 35×
- State v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-02-27· cited 30×
- State v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court· 1955-10-05· cited 29×
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-11-22· cited 21×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-13· cited 20×
- State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1974-06-04· cited 18×
- State v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-04-16· cited 18×
- State v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court· 1954-12-23· cited 17×
- State v. IversonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-01-06· cited 13×
- State v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-08-10· cited 12×
- State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-09-13· cited 11×
- State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1974-12-20· cited 10×
- State v. IversonUtah Supreme Court· 1960-03-07· cited 9×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-11-18· cited 6×
- State v. IversonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2003-09-24· cited 5×
- State v. IversonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-03-17· cited 5×
- State v. IversonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-15· cited 5×
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-15· cited 4×
- State v. IversonOregon Supreme Court· 1962-05-23· cited 3×
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2004-05-14
- State v. IversonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2019-03-05
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-07
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-06
- State v. IversonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-09-22
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-02-06
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-07-08
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-11-05
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-22
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-02-07
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-04-10
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1967-12-11
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2004-05-14
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2004-09-03
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-28
- State v. IversonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.