Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/17/2006

State v. Bryan

Citations

281 Kan. 157
130 P.3d 85
2006 Kan. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[o]nce the juiy has decided, an appellate court does not determine whether the evidence is incompatible with any reasonable hypothesis except guilt”
affirming conviction for lewd and lascivious behavior when exposure occurred in nonconsenting person's bedroom and holding that the statute does not require the victim to actually perceive the offending act
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law over which this court has unlimited review.”
“A statute should not be read to add language that is not found in it . . . .”
statutory interpretation a question of law over which appellate court has unlimited review
ordinary words are to be given ordinary meaning and when statute is plain and unambiguous, appellate court must give effect to legislature's intent as expressed rather than determining what law should or should not be

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.