Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 7/1/1997

State v. Hungerford

Citations

142 N.H. 110
697 A.2d 916
1997 N.H. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that repressed memories must satisfy a threshold reliability inquiry before being admitted at trial
concluding that repressed memories must satisfy a threshold reliability inquiry before being admitted at trial
explaining that when challenged, “testimony that relies on memories which previously have been partially or fully repressed must satisfy a pretrial reliability determination” which may require the trial court to hold a pretrial hearing on admissibility
describing how victims retrieved memories of past abuse by submitting to over one hundred sessions of psychotherapy or institutionalization coupled with psychotherapy
declining to adopt Daubert, but noting that state evidence code, caselaw from other jurisdictions, as well as Daubert, were helpful considerations in determining the admissibility of expert witness testimony
declining to adopt Daubert, but noting that state evidence code, caselaw from other jurisdictions, as well as Daubert, were helpful considerations in determining the admissibility of expert witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Horton, Others

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hungerford

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.