Nevada Supreme Court· 1/14/2010

Higgs v. State

Citations

222 P.3d 648
126 Nev. 1
126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 1
2010 Nev. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that decision to give or reject jury instructions is reviewed for “an abuse of discretion or judicial error”
stating that a court's decision on a motion for a continuance is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
stating that a court's decision on a motion for a continuance is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
stating that a court's decision on a motion for a continuance is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
stating that a court's decision on a motion for a continuance is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
explaining that in order to demonstrate a district court’s abuse of discretion when denying a continuance, the challenging party must demonstrate the denial had a prejudicial effect on the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Cherry, Saitta, Parraguirre, Douglas, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.