State v. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court’s curative instruction “clearly instructed the jury to disregard [a witness’s] remark and not draw any inferences from it,” and, therefore, it “sufficiently cured any prejudice stemming from [that] statement”
• “Where the jury could draw several inferences from challenged testimony, one of which is innocuous, the testimony is not so prejudicial as to be incurable by contemporaneous jury instructions.”
• “The jury is presumed to follow a trial court’s curative instruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Willey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-05-01· cited 16×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-03-30· cited 15×
• State v. Joseph Kuchman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-04-19· cited 9×
• State v. Reid
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-03-16· cited 7×
• State of New Hampshire v. Barion Perry
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-05-22· cited 1×
• State v. Farrell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2024-05-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hungerford
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-07-01· cited 36×
• State v. Carbo
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-12-28· cited 12×
• State v. Sammataro
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-05-22· cited 10×
• State v. Rogan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-01-06· cited 3×
• State v. Steele
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-07-03· cited 2×