Arizona Supreme Court· 5/21/1985

State v. Huey

Citations

699 P.2d 1290
145 Ariz. 59
1985 Ariz. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

approving of Marks and Liddell in a case where there is evidence of intercourse and defendant alleges consent
admitting expert tes timony of rape trauma syndrome to show lack of consent
we “might have some difficulty in upholding the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome to prove the existence of rape”
although the evidence in question was not rape trauma syndrome evidence, testimony concerning rape trauma syndrome is admissible when the defendant claims consent as a defense
although the evidence in question was not rape trauma syndrome evidence, testimony concerning rape trauma syndrome is admissible when the defendant claims consent as a defense
rape trauma syndrome evidence on the issue of consent held admissible but court questions its use to prove that a rape occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.