Supreme Court of Missouri· 1/17/1984

State v. Taylor

Citations

663 S.W.2d 235
1984 Mo. LEXIS 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that expert's testimony was not sufficiently based on technique to overcome inherent danger of prejudice created by his status as an expert
holding that expert's testimony was not sufficiently based on technique to overcome inherent danger of prejudice created by his status as an expert
ruling that an expert’s opinion that the victim suffered from rape trauma syndrome “vouched too much for the victim’s credibility” as it related to her claim that she did not consent
stating that expert testimony regarding a witness’s reliability in distinguishing truth from fantasy invades the province of the jury to make credibility determinations
holding inadmissible testimony from a psychiatrist that the victim was not fantasizing when she described the rape
Although expert may testify that victim exhibits characteristics consistent with those resulting from rape, he may not testify that victim was raped by defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.