Fugate v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “questions of admissibility based purely on such considerations as relevance are questions of law calling for application of rules to the particular set of facts”
• questions of admissibility of evidence based purely on considerations such as relevance are reviewed as questions of law
• although a jury may not reach a verdict solely through speculation or guess work, “it must be able to ‘apply the ordinary experience of mankind’ to the facts and draw reasonable inferences” (quoting Law v. Kemp, 276 Or 581, 585-86, 556 P2d 109 (1976)
• the factfinder may draw reasonable inferences from the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).