Skip to main content

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 840 P.2d 711
  • 115 Or. App. 281
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding for a new trial where, inter alia, trial court preempted defense offer of proof inquiring as to whether state’s witness had prior arrests: “[the defendant] had an absolute right to make an offer of proof’
  • any evidence that crucial prosecution witness had an arrest record would be relevant to bias
  • reversible error when the defendant had a right to make an offer of proof and the court refused to allow him to make the offer
  • reversible error when the defendant had a right to make an offer of proof and the court refused to allow him to make the offer
  • court commits reversible error by refusing to permit a party to make an offer of proof regarding excluded evidence
  • prosecutor’s inquiry on direct examination of state’s witness as to whether he had been given “any leniency in criminal matters” “opened the door to cross-examination about [that witness’s] arrest record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Muniz, De Muniz, Rossman, Buttler, Deits, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.