Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/11/2007

State v. Shelly

Citations

157 P.3d 234
212 Or. App. 65
2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a trial court’s “discretion to limit impeachment evidence that goes to interest or bias applies only to evidence that ampli- fies, develops, or elaborates an ‘initial showing’”
evidence that witness was on probation and thus had reason to curry favor with the state was admissible to show bias of the witness
trial court erred by refusing to allow the defendant to impeach the victim with evidence that the victim was on probation and had been the subject of a recent criminal investigation
“[T]he court’s discretion to limit impeachment evidence that goes to interest or bias applies only to evidence that amplifies, develops, or elaborates an ‘initial showing.’ ”
trial court erred by refusing to allow the defendant to impeach a witness with evidence that the witness was on probation and had been the subject of a recent criminal investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Hargreaves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.