State v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that even if a victim’s loss is not “easily measurable,” any restitution amount must still bear a reasonable relationship to the loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-25· cited 37×
• In Re Ryan A.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-02-12· cited 35×
• State v. Lindsley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-23· cited 29×
• State v. Steffy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-01· cited 26×
• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-28· cited 17×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-28· cited 6×
• G.F. v. Hon. Nielson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-09-03
• E. H. v. Hon. Slayton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2025-04-30
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2026-05-20
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2026-05-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-10-05· cited 32×
• State v. Scroggins
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-02· cited 23×
• State v. Anderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-09· cited 17×
• State v. Pleasant
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-23· cited 12×
• State v. Monick
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-03· cited 11×
• State v. Currie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-01· cited 9×
• In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-96304
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-11-05· cited 9×
• In Re Maricopa County Appeal
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-11-02· cited 5×