State v. Brita

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is improper for an appellate court to consider an issue for the first time on appeal
• noting that waiver is more appropriate for \fact-intensive\ issues based on \sound principles of judicial policy\
• refusing to address suppression ruling on an alternative basis not litigated in superior court because hearing “might well have taken a decidedly different twist”
• approving court of appeals decision which suppressed test result secured before arrest in violation of implied-consent statute
• finding the state waived its opportunity to argue the applicability of a 3 statute on appeal because it never argued the applicability of the statute to the trial court
• \It is particularly inappropriate to consider an issue for the first time on appeal where the issue is a fact-intensive one.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).