Skip to main content

State v. Housley

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 1143

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's \motion to vacate a void judgment of conviction for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.\ The trial court had jurisdiction over appellant's criminal case. The trial court did not err in construing appellant's motion as a petition for postconviction relief so construed, appellant's motion was untimely. Even if we were to address appellant's claim, he did not demonstrate that a discovery or Brady violation occurred. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.