Skip to main content

State v. Scott

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 300

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's untimely petitions for postconviction relief or, alternatively, motions for leave to file a motion for new trial. Appellant did not present evidence that he had been unavoidably prevented from discovering evidence or that a Brady violation had occurred. The trial court did not err in overruling the petitions/motions without holding an evidentiary hearing. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.