State v. Housley

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4140

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in finding the appellant's motion for return of property to be moot insofar as the motion sought property that previously had been ordered forfeited and destroyed. The trial court erred, however, in finding that it lacked authority to order the City of Troy to return a safe that allegedly belonged to the appellant and that was not addressed in the prior forfeiture order. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.