Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/7/2022
State v. Clemmons
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 27
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellant's post-conviction \Claim of Actual Innocence\ because it was an untimely, successive petition for post-conviction relief that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider, and because the claims raised therein were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court· 2002-08-28· cited 291×
- State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 247×
- State v. CurrentOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-10· cited 28×
- State v. McCainOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-08· cited 15×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-26· cited 14×
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 11×
- State v. HousleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 10×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-08· cited 9×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-13· cited 5×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-02· cited 4×
- State v. SageOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.