Tennessee Supreme Court· 9/21/2000

State v. Hooper

Citations

29 S.W.3d 1
2000 Tenn. LEXIS 535
2000 WL 1357520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that deterrence is an appropriate consideration when the act is intentional and when the defendant committed similar acts prior, regardless of whether the previous acts resulted in arrest or conviction
determining that where there is a delay between arrest and indictment, a due process violation will be found where (1) there has been a delay, (2) it has caused the accused to suffer actual prejudice, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice William M. Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

830 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hooper

71 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.