Idaho Supreme Court· 12/24/2007
State v. Hooper
Citations
- 176 P.3d 911
- 145 Idaho 139
- 2007 Ida. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was error to admit a video-taped interview of an alleged child victim of sexual abuse because the defendant was deprived of the right to cross-examine the child
- determining several factors indicating 16 that the examiner worked in concert with police
- determining several factors indicating that the examiner worked in concert with police
- finding a child’s statement to a doctor to be testimonial where (1) the police arranged a forensic exam and observed the interview via a closed circuit system and (2) a tape of the interview was immediately placed with other evidence in a police storage
- videotape of child victim’s interview with police was testimonial because it was admitted as a substitute for her live testimony
- videotaped statements by six- year-old victim to nurse and forensic examiner were testimonial, as interview was geared toward gathering evidence, rather than providing treatment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Trout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne CannonTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-04-29· cited 309×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-14· cited 82×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-28· cited 75×
- State v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-03-15· cited 73×
- State v. ShackelfordIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 70×
- State v. Katherine Lea StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-04-01· cited 62×
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13· cited 53×
- State v. Daniel Edward Ehrlick, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-07-21· cited 37×
- State v. GerardoIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-01-07· cited 34×
- Seely v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-04-10· cited 33×
- State v. FolkIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 29×
- State v. Darin William PartonIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-02-01· cited 22×
- State v. BernalIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-09-14· cited 21×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-11-04· cited 18×
- People v. SpanglerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-07-21· cited 17×
- Hooper v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-02-04· cited 14×
- State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-05-21· cited 13×
- State v. TsosieNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2022-07-14· cited 13×
- State v. Dale Carter ShackelfordIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-10-30· cited 9×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 1,200×
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-07-20· cited 156×
- People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-01-23· cited 133×
- State v. JustusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-21· cited 86×
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. DeOliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-06-19· cited 54×
- State v. SherrodIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-01-02· cited 38×
- State v. CopeIdaho Supreme Court· 2006-02-02· cited 33×
- Garza v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 32×
- State v. PeightalIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-05-01· cited 28×
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-07-10· cited 27×
- State v. OdiagaIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-02-03· cited 24×
- State v. KraskySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 21×
- State v. GreenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-12-13· cited 10×
- Doe v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-12-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.