Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 12/24/2007

State v. Hooper

Citations

  • 176 P.3d 911
  • 145 Idaho 139
  • 2007 Ida. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was error to admit a video-taped interview of an alleged child victim of sexual abuse because the defendant was deprived of the right to cross-examine the child
  • determining several factors indicating 16 that the examiner worked in concert with police
  • determining several factors indicating that the examiner worked in concert with police
  • finding a child’s statement to a doctor to be testimonial where (1) the police arranged a forensic exam and observed the interview via a closed circuit system and (2) a tape of the interview was immediately placed with other evidence in a police storage
  • videotape of child victim’s interview with police was testimonial because it was admitted as a substitute for her live testimony
  • videotaped statements by six- year-old victim to nurse and forensic examiner were testimonial, as interview was geared toward gathering evidence, rather than providing treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Trout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.