State of Tennessee v. Susan Renee Bise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “although the statutory language continues to describe appellate review as de novo with a presumption of correctness,” the 2005 revisions to the Sentencing Act “effectively abrogated the de novo standard of appellate review”
• allowing for the possibility of appellate court's modifying a sentence when the record is sufficient
• observing “that the Court of Criminal Appeals properly ruled that the evidence does not support the single enhancement factor applied by the trial court”
• modifying standard of review of within-range sentences to abuse of discretion with a presumption of reasonableness
• “[M]ere disagreement with the trial court’s weighing of the properly assigned enhancement and mitigating factors is no longer a ground for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).