State v. Leggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application of mitigating factor (6) for twenty-one year old defendant was inappropriate where -5- record was devoid of any evidence that defendant lacked substantial judgment to appreciate the nature of his conduct
• concluding that remorse is an appropriate mitigating factor under (13)
• concluding that remorse is an appropriate mitigating factor under (13)
• listing drunk driving as one of several offenses warranting “special treatment” with regard to proof requirement
• \The injuries suggest a more extensive and protracted beating than the two kicks [sufficient to establish the crime] admitted to by Appellant.\
• the weight assigned to enhancement and mitigating factors is generally left to the trial court’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).