State v. Hooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under Wis. Stat. § 161.55(1)(f) (1983-84) the state is only required to show that the seized property was \derived from or realized through the commission of any crime\ under Wis. Stat. ch. 161 (1983-84), the predecessor to Wis. Stat. ch. 961
• under Wis. Stat. § 161.55(1)(f) (1983-84) the state is only required to show that the seized property was \derived from or realized through the commission of any crime\ under Wis. Stat. ch. 161 (1983-84), the predecessor to Wis. Stat. ch. 961

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lundquist v. McBeth
  Montana Supreme Court· 2001-12-31· cited 7×
• American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-01-30· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• St. John Vianney School v. Board of Education of School District of Janesville
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-06-15· cited 33×
• State v. One 1973 Cadillac
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-03-21· cited 9×