State v. Easterly
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1771
Syllabus
REOPENING – App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel untimely pro se application to reopen direct appeal Appellant's application was not filed within the 90-day time requirement pursuant to App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b) Appellant fails to establish good cause for the delay even assuming that Appellant had complied with the requirements of App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b), he fails to meet the standard for reopening this appeal pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984) Appellant fails to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on appeal application denied.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.