Skip to main content

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 801 N.W.2d 646
  • 2011 Minn. LEXIS 502
  • 2011 WL 3687535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the bullet trajectory and wounds contradicted the defendant’s claim that the victim was standing and facing him at the time of the shooting
  • holding that a party may impeach a witness with an unspecified felony conviction
  • stating that felony convictions are probative of a witness’s credibility, and the fact that a witness is a convicted felon has impeachment value
  • stating that “[appellate courts] will not reverse a district court’s ruling on the impeachment of a witness by prior conviction absent a clear abuse of discretion” (quotation omitted)
  • explaining that, for prosecutorial-misconduct claims, a modified substantial-rights test is applied
  • allowing impeachment with an unspecified felony as long as the felony is admissible under rule 609(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.