Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 417 P.2d 62
  • 76 N.M. 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discretion of trial court in controlling extent of cross-examination of accused will not be disturbed on appeal unless action was obviously erroneous, arbitrary and unwarranted
  • appellate court will not disturb trial court's exercise of discretion in controlling extent of cross-examination of accused unless obviously erroneous, unwarranted, or arbitrary
  • appellate court will not disturb trial court’s exercise of discretion in controlling extent of cross-examination of accused unless obviously erroneous, unwarranted, or arbitrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oman, Carmody, Noble, Moise, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.