Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 820 N.W.2d 525
  • 2012 Minn. LEXIS 493
  • 2012 WL 4094345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the appellant had not shown a significant effect on the verdict when the challenged testimony was general in nature, cumulative to other evidence, corroborated by other evidence, and “only minimally relied on” at trial
  • stating that “decisions about which witnesses to interview are typically matters of trial strategy that we will not review”
  • “An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.”
  • “When an error implicates a constitutional right, we will award a new trial unless the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if the jury’s verdict was surely unattributable to the error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gildea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.