State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the Court’s extension of the Brady disclosure rule to guilty plea and sentencing procedures
• holding Brady does not apply in revocation proceedings because of the lower eviden-tiary threshold
• providing an extensive discussion of the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Moses
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-11-05· cited 43×
• Hyman v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-03-14· cited 16×
• Dangerfield v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-01-14· cited 11×
• State v. Pauling
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 10×
• State v. Hemmes
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-10-16· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Kyles v. Whitley
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Mempa v. Rhay
  Supreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
• State v. Kelley
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-24· cited 60×
• State v. Burton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-03· cited 58×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-10-31· cited 23×
• State v. Franks
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-08-11· cited 14×
• State v. Hook
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-24· cited 9×
• Duckson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-09-08· cited 8×
• State v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 2×