Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/24/2003
State v. Hook
Citations
- 590 S.E.2d 25
- 356 S.C. 421
- 2003 S.C. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the statute effectively operates to keep the probationer’s confession to his probation agent out of court
- stating that the statute effectively operates to keep the probationer's confession to his probation agent out of court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-19· cited 59×
- State v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 49×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-08· cited 9×
- Hutto v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-05· cited 7×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of CanuppCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-04· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- United States v. HavensSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 665×
- State v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-02-11· cited 28×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-08-08· cited 14×
- State v. HookCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.