State v. Franks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fourth Amendment's requirement that a neutral magistrate issue an arrest warrant is not applicable to a probationer charged with a violation
• holding that the Fourth Amendment’s requirement that a neutral magistrate issue an arrest warrant is not applicable to a probationer charged with a violation
• holding the Fourth Amendment's requirement that a neutral, detached magistrate issue an arrest warrant did not apply to a warrant issued by a probation officer for violations of probation conditions
• A “probation revocation proceeding is not a criminal trial ... but a more informal proceeding with respect to notice and proof of the alleged violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pauling
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 10×
• State v. Barlow
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-03-26· cited 9×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-08· cited 9×
• State v. Ross
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-06-13· cited 9×
• Huckaby v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-08-05· cited 8×
• State v. Tisdale
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-05· cited 4×
• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-04· cited 2×
• State v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 2×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Jones v. Cunningham
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 1,503×
• State v. Hiott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-03· cited 55×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-10-31· cited 23×