Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/14/2008
Dangerfield v. State
Citations
- 656 S.E.2d 352
- 376 S.C. 176
- 2008 S.C. LEXIS 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the imposition of a suspended sentence deprived the defendant of a conditional liberty interest and implicated the defendants due process rights
- holding that due process required notice and a hearing on the willfulness of the defendant’s failure to pay restitution before imposition of a suspended sentence
- including “the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses” as one of the requirements of “[t]he procedural component of the state and federal due process clauses”
- applying federal due process law to claims under both the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 3 of the South Carolina constitution
- \Due process considerations apply in contested cases or hearings which affect an individual's property or liberty interests as contemplated by the federal and state constitutions.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-10-23· cited 16×
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-06-26· cited 11×
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-22· cited 8×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 7×
- Bullis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-04-13
- State v. GleatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-08-07
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-22· cited 53×
- Talley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-22· cited 20×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-08· cited 9×
- Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-05-11· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.