Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/8/2006

State v. Hicks

Citations

147 P.3d 1076
282 Kan. 599
2006 Kan. LEXIS 713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that deferential judicial review of warrants and searches based on diem incentivizes decision of law enforcement officers to seek warrants
declining to consider good faith exception to exclusionary rule when appellant failed to argue its applications
discounting reports from unnamed citizen informants when the basis of their knowledge has not been disclosed in affidavit
finding drag history occurring 6 years before warrant was issued to be “extremely stale” and concluding that, without more, it did not provide probable cause
noting lack of value in unidentified, uncorroborated tip when affidavit contains no evidence of informant’s veracity
detailing how and why information from “concerned citizens” is to be tested for veracity and basis of knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.