Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/6/2007

State v. Hoeck

Citations

163 P.3d 252
284 Kan. 441
2007 Kan. LEXIS 460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the \substantial basis\ test cannot be used to determine both the validity of the warrant and the applicability of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule because \the answer in the first context necessarily predetermines the answer in the second context\
adopting the four exceptions enunciated in Leon for the suppression of evidence illegally seized based on good-faith reliance on invalid warrant
adopting without modification Leon exceptions for \suppression of evidence illegally seized based on good-faith reliance on invalid warrant\
considering good faith exception when warrant issued without sufficient probable cause
considering good faith exception when warrant issued without sufficient probable cause
\The question of whether this court has correctly construed the Leon good faith exception is one of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Johnson, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hoeck

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.