Skip to main content

State v. Hensley

Citations

  • 298 Kan. 422
  • 313 P.3d 814
  • 2013 WL 6383039
  • 2013 Kan. LEXIS 1300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that possession of marijuana and possession of marijuana with no tax stamp violate the Double Jeopardy Clauses
  • noting that although the language of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights are not identical, they are similar and have been interpreted as providing the same protection against double jeopardy
  • \[B]oth K.S.A. 21-3107 [now K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-5109 ] and the Double Jeopardy Clauses require reversal of both the conviction and sentence if the legislature did not intend multiple punishments.\
  • under case facts the unidentified informant’s tip was entitled to no weight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.