Skip to main content

State v. Probst

Citations

  • 795 P.2d 393
  • 247 Kan. 196
  • 1990 Kan. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding 15-month old conviction, “without more, would undoubtedly be too stale” to support probable cause
  • noting that a single conviction, fifteen months in the past, would not be sufficient by itself to establish probable cause that drugs would be at a specific location
  • exclusionary rule should not be applied to bar evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even though the warrant is ultimately found to be invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.