Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 11/23/2016

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 161 Idaho 444
  • 387 P.3d 112
  • 2016 Ida. LEXIS 369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To show that a statement is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, the party arguing for the admission 19 must show that the statement will be relevant to an issue in the case without regard for its truthfulness.”
  • “To show that a statement is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, the party arguing for the admission 19 must show that the statement will be relevant to an issue in the case without regard for its truthfulness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Jones, Eismann, Burdick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.