Skip to main content

Small v. State

Citations

  • 211 A.3d 236
  • 464 Md. 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the majority opinion was not, as the concurring opinion suggested, “dismiss[ing] decades of extensive social science research” regarding the reliability of eyewitness identification (alteration in original)
  • “Findings cannot be clearly erroneous if there is any competent material evidence to 9 support the factual findings of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.